Skip to the contents
The Blade Register

European swords, described entry by entry

Typology: how swords are classified

A typology is a way of putting a name to a shape so that two people looking at two different swords can be sure they are talking about the same thing. Europe has produced three of them for three periods, and they classify different parts of the sword. This section explains what each one measures, where it applies, and what it deliberately ignores.

Entries in this section

3 of 8 entries All eight entries
  1. TYP-01

    The Oakeshott typology, type by type

    Ewart Oakeshott sorted medieval European blades by geometry rather than by country or century. His types X to XXII are still the labels on museum cards and auction listings.

    Period
    c. 1050 to 1550
    Type
    Classification
  2. TYP-02

    Viking age sword types, classified by the hilt

    Blades of the eighth to eleventh century are broadly alike, so the classifications work on the hilt. Three competing systems are in circulation and museum labels mix them freely.

    Period
    c. 750 to 1100
    Type
    Classification
  3. TYP-03

    The longsword, 1350 to 1550

    A longsword is defined by a grip long enough for two hands and a blade balanced for both. Surviving pieces weigh 1.2 to 1.8 kg, not the four kilos of popular imagination.

    Period
    c. 1350 to 1550
    Type
    Classification

From the shield wall to the drawing room

5 families compared

Five hundred years separate the first and the last row of this table, and the direction of travel is consistent: less mass, more point, and a sword that is worn in the street rather than carried to a battle.

Five families of European sword compared. Figures are the ranges usually published for surviving examples, not standards anyone worked to.
FamilyRough periodOverall lengthWeightHandsMade for
Viking age sword800 to 105090 to 100 cm1.0 to 1.3 kgOne, with a shieldCutting
Arming sword1050 to 150090 to 105 cm1.0 to 1.4 kgOne, with a shield or bucklerCut and thrust
Longsword1350 to 1550110 to 130 cm1.2 to 1.8 kgTwoCut, thrust, and half swording in armour
Rapier1550 to 1650110 to 130 cm1.0 to 1.5 kgOne, complex hiltCivilian thrusting, in town
Smallsword1650 to 180085 to 100 cm0.5 to 0.8 kgOneCivilian thrusting only, worn as dress

The rapier and the smallsword are civilian weapons, and that is the whole explanation for their proportions. A rapier is long because the fight starts at conversational distance with no shield and no armour; a smallsword is light because it is worn all day with a coat.

What a type name does and does not tell you

  • It tells you a shape. Nothing more. A type is a description, not a certificate of date, origin or quality.
  • It does not date the sword. Find contexts date swords. Typological dates are ranges, and they overlap.
  • It does not describe the hilt, except in the Viking age systems, where it describes only the hilt.
  • It says nothing about the steel. That takes a metallographic section, which means cutting the object.